Skip to content
CholesterolResearch
← All studies
High tierRandomized Controlled TrialCitation verified

Cholesterol Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease

Salim Yusuf, Jackie Bosch, Gilles R Dagenais, Jun Zhu, HOPE-3 Investigators - New England Journal of Medicine, 2016

The cleanest test of statins in ordinary primary prevention: it enrolled intermediate-risk people without selecting them by cholesterol level. Rosuvastatin lowered LDL by 26.5% and reduced the first coprimary endpoint by 24% (HR 0.76), with an absolute event reduction of roughly 1.1 points over 5.6 years and no excess of diabetes or cancer.

Key findings

Effect measures

  • Hazard Ratio: 0.76 (first coprimary outcome)95% CI 0.64-0.91
  • Absolute Risk Reduction: ~1.1 percentage points (3.7% vs 4.8%)
  • Number Needed To Treat: ~91 over 5.6 years (derived from the 1.1-point absolute reduction; not stated in the abstract)

Why this evidence tier (High)

Risk of bias:
Large double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial run to completion.
Precision:
Well powered; precise estimate around a modest absolute effect.
Directness:
The most directly relevant trial for unselected intermediate-risk primary prevention - no lipid-based entry criterion.
Consistency:
Concordant with the broader statin evidence.
Funding / COI:
Co-funded by AstraZeneca alongside a public funder (CIHR); partial industry sponsorship.

High certainty that statins reduce events in unselected intermediate-risk primary prevention; the honest qualifier is that the absolute benefit is modest.

Population:
12,705 intermediate-risk adults in 21 countries without cardiovascular disease, enrolled WITHOUT lipid-level selection (rosuvastatin 10 mg vs placebo arm); median follow-up 5.6 years.
Conflicts of interest:
Partly industry-funded (AstraZeneca, co-sponsor with CIHR). The drug manufacturer is explicitly named in the funding statement.
Funding:
Canadian Institutes of Health Research and AstraZeneca (manufacturer of rosuvastatin); NCT00468923.

Limitations

  • Intermediate-risk, not the very lowest-risk; absolute benefit is modest.
  • Industry co-sponsorship by the drug manufacturer.

How this study is used