Skip to content
CholesterolResearch
← All studies
High tierRandomized Controlled TrialCitation verified

Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia

J Shepherd, S M Cobbe, I Ford, C G Isles, A R Lorimer, West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group - New England Journal of Medicine, 1995

The first large primary-prevention statin trial. In hypercholesterolaemic men with no prior heart attack, pravastatin lowered LDL by 26% and cut the combined risk of nonfatal MI or coronary death by 31%. All-cause mortality fell 22%, but that result was borderline and not statistically significant (p=0.051).

Key findings

Effect measures

  • Relative Risk Reduction: 31% fewer nonfatal MI / coronary deaths95% CI 17-43%
  • Relative Risk Reduction: 22% lower all-cause mortality (borderline, p=0.051)95% CI 0-40%

Why this evidence tier (High)

Risk of bias:
Large double-blind randomized placebo-controlled primary-prevention trial.
Precision:
Well powered for the composite endpoint; the mortality endpoint was underpowered (borderline).
Directness:
Hard clinical endpoints in a true primary-prevention population.
Consistency:
Concordant with later primary-prevention trials and meta-analyses.
Funding / COI:
Manufacturer-funded (Bristol-Myers Squibb); a conflicted sponsor.

High certainty for event reduction in higher-risk (hypercholesterolaemic) primary prevention; the mortality signal alone is only borderline.

Population:
6595 men aged 45-64 with hypercholesterolaemia (mean cholesterol ~7.0 mmol/L) and no history of myocardial infarction; average follow-up 4.9 years.
Conflicts of interest:
Industry-sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, which manufactures pravastatin. Funding statement is in the NEJM full text, not the PubMed abstract.
Funding:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute (manufacturer of pravastatin).

Limitations

  • Population was selected for high cholesterol, so it is not "low-risk" primary prevention.
  • Men only; results may not transfer directly to women.
  • All-cause mortality benefit did not reach significance.

How this study is used